JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 2, 2023

A- de 2023

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant Jenny Carolina Aristizábal Pulgarín

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad De Auto De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por incumplimiento de requisitos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad del Auto 1250/23, suscrita por la apoderada de la IPS Universitaria.

Luego de analizar el precitado asunto concluyó la Sala Plena de la Corporación que lo pretendido es improcedente, por el incumplimiento de los requisitos de legitimación y carga argumentativa.

Con base en lo anterior se rechazó la nulidad invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de nulidad en contra del Auto 1250 de 2023 presentada por la señora Jenny Carolina Aristizábal Pulgarín, apoderada de la Fundación Hospitalaria San Vicente de Paul Rionegro.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR esta providencia a través de la Secretaría General de la Corte, informando a la peticionaria que contra esta decisión no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.